Doctor-patient relationship: the development of a new medical culture
Keywords:
doctor-patient relationship, medical culture, ethicsAbstract
The doctor-patient relationship has changed and it is necessary to carry out a critical reflection on the health-disease processes in the different sets where they take place to develop a new sanitary culture. In this context, Bioethics and its principles favor a different way of understanding the doctor-patient relationship, where the right the patient has as a person with autonomy in taking decisions about his health is privileged, and it is recognized the a shared responsibility that takes into consideration the strike of ethic, psychological, economic, cultural, social and biological factors on medical and health care. The contribution of Philosophy, Bioethics, and Medical Ethics is necessary to investigate and study the doctor-patient relationship in its different dimensions: ethic, medical, social and moral; strengthening the physicians’ ethic and legal bases, achieving them to be able of analyzing making propositions leading to the solution of conflicts and dilemmas generated with the development, knowledge innovation and the application of technology in human people and all the rest of living beings
Downloads
References
2. Pérez-Tamayo R. y Col. La Construcción de la Bioética. Vol. 1. Fondo de Cultura Económica. México. 2007
3. Singer, P. Practical Ethics. Second Edition. Cambridge UniversityPress. USA. 1993.
4. Reporte Belmont: principios éticos y directrices para la Protección de sujetos humanos de investigación. Reporte de la Comisión Nacional para la Protección de Sujetos Humanos de Investigación Biomédica y de Comportamiento. Abril 18, 1979.
5. Yerramilli D. On cultivating the courage to spreak up: The critical role of attendings in the moral development of physicians in training. Hasting Cent Rep. Sept 2014; 44(5):30-2.
6. Robinson E.M., Lee S.M., Zollfrank A., Jurchak M., Frost D., y Grace P. Enhancing moral agency: Clinical Ethics Residency for Nurses. Hastings Cent Rep. Sep-Oct 2014; pp 12-20.
7. Farrel R.M., Metcalfe J.S., McGowan M.L., Weise K.L., Agatisa P.K., Berg J. Emerging Ethical Issues in Reproductive Medicine: Are Bioethics Educators Ready. Hastings Cent Rep Sept 2014;44(5):21-9.
8. Gracia, D., Como arqueros al blanco. Estudios de Bioética. Ed. Triacastela. Navarra, España. 2004. Pp-105-107.
9. Irving D.N. Which Medical Ethics for the 21st Century? The Linacre Quarterly. Feb 2003; 70(1): 46-59.
10. News Staff. In the 21st Century, Bioethics Literacy Matters. Scientific Blogging. Science 2.0 Sept 2014; http://www.science20.com
11. Arellano J.S. Teoría Ética para una ética aplicada. Ed. Universitaria. Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro. México 2013.
12. Hall R.T. y Arellano J.S. La Casuística. Una metodología para la ética aplicada. D.R. Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro. Ed. Fontamara. México. 2013.
13. Arellano J.S. y Farías E., “De la herencia de la filosofía aristotélica a la casuística contemporánea”, Dilemata 2016. No. 20. http://www.dilemata.net/revista/index.php/dilemata/article/view/423/414
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All content published in this journal is Open Access, distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 License.
It allows:
- Copy and redistribute published material in any medium or format.
- Adapt the content.
This will be done under the following terms:
- Attribute the authors' credits and indicate whether changes were made, in which case it must be in a reasonable way.
- Non-commercial use.
- Recognize the journal where it is published.
The copyrights of each article are maintained, without restrictions.