Ethics, prudence and medical education. From classical moral to current needs
Keywords:
ethics, prudence, medical education.Abstract
Among the common links between medical and ethical education, prudence, as a virtue, is highly important. Both, in clinical training and in moral education there is a main principle: not to damage and seeking good in actions. These similarities have being a constant since the ancient Greece; philosophers like Hippocrates and Aristotle had something in common: both were passionate doctors, and both were sponsors of the good living. In the current article we analyze the Hippocrates oak, stating its relationship with the modern bioethics thoughts. Likewise, we intended to show how, since the ancient times up today, with the new challenges of the modern times, prudence and moral virtue intertwine from the beginning to the end in health professionals training.
Downloads
References
2. Cañete R, Prior A, Brito K, Guilhem D, et al. Development of an institutional curriculum in ethics and public health. Acta bioeth [Internet]. 2013 Nov [citado 31/07/19]; 19(2): 251-7. Disponible en: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1726-569X2013000200009&lng=es.
3. Stoddard HA, O'Dell DV. Would Socrates Have Actually Used the "Socratic Method" for Clinical Teaching? J Gen Intern Med. 2016; 31(9): 1092-6. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 27130623.
4. Papadimos TJ. Reflective thinking and medical students: some thoughtful distillations regarding John Dewey and Hannah Arendt. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2009 Apr 16; 4:5. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 19368737.
5. Aristóteles. Metafísica. Madrid: Gredos; 1994.
6. Arellano Rodríguez JS. Teoría ética para una ética aplicada. México: Editorial Universitaria; 2013.
7. Aristóteles. Ética eudemia. Madrid: Gredos; 1988.
8. Aristóteles. Ética a Nicómaco. Madrid: Gredos; 1988.
9. Romero-Zepeda H. La CREEI y los retos de la capacitación en bioética ante nuevos y complejos dilemas de salud. Rev Médic Electrón [Internet]. 2017 [citado 30/06/18]; 39(6). Disponible en: http://www.revmedicaelectronica.sld.cu/index.php/rme/article/view/2116.
10. Robinson EM, Lee SM, Zollfrank A, et al. Enhancing moral agency: Clinical Ethics Residency for Nurses. Hastings Cent Rep. 2014; 44(5): 12-20. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 25231657.
11. García C, Lara MD, López Férez JA, et al. Tratados hipocráticos I. Madrid: Biblioteca Clásica Gredos; 1983. p. 77-83.
12. González Menéndez RA. La vocación médica en el mundo actual. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2017.
13. Sánchez-Salvatierra JM, Rondan Alvaro T. Evolution of the Hippocratic Oath: What has changed and why? Rev méd Chile [Internet]. 2018 Dec [citado 15/08/19]; 146(12): 1498-1500. Disponible en: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872018001201498&lng=en.http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872018001201498.
14. Semper González AI, Sánchez Cepero Zd, Brito Pérez K, et al. Pedagogía de la bioética y ética de la pedagogía. Una relación virtuosa. Rev Médic Electrón [Internet]. 2018 [citado 30/06/18]; 40(3). Disponible en: http://revmedicaelectronica.sld.cu/index.php/rme/article/view/1924.
15. Hall RT. Casuística y principialismo. Dilemata [Internet]. 2016; (20). Disponible en: file:///C:/Users/MAGDAL~1/AppData/Local/Temp/Dialnet-CasuisticaYPrincipialismo-5329387-3.pdf.
16. Hall RT. La casuística como pedagogía para enseñar la Bioética. Rev Méd Electrón [Internet]. 2017 [citado 31/07/19]; 39(Supl 1). Disponible en: www.scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1684-18242017000700012.
17. De Panfilis L, Di Leo S, Peruselli C, et al. “I go into crisis when?”: ethics of care and moral dilemmas in palliative care. BMC Palliat Care. 2019; 18(1): 70. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 31399094.
18. Vig EK, Merel SE. Ethics Education During Palliative Medicine Fellowship. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019; 36(12): 1076-80. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 31342770.
19. Hartman LA, Metselaar S, Molewijk AC, et al. Developing an ethics support tool for dealing with dilemmas around client autonomy based on moral case deliberations. BMC Med Ethics. 2018; 19(1): 97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0335-9.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All content published in this journal is Open Access, distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 License.
It allows:
- Copy and redistribute published material in any medium or format.
- Adapt the content.
This will be done under the following terms:
- Attribute the authors' credits and indicate whether changes were made, in which case it must be in a reasonable way.
- Non-commercial use.
- Recognize the journal where it is published.
The copyrights of each article are maintained, without restrictions.