Outcomes assessment in the treatment of patients with tibial pylon fractures

Authors

Keywords:

tibial pylon fracture, consolidation, osteosynthesis.

Abstract

Introduction: tibial pylon fractures are a challenge for the surgeon surgery and currently there is a controversy regarding their treatment.
Objective: to assess the outcomes of the applied treatment.
Materials and methods: an observational, descriptive, longitudinal study was carried out with the study universe of all the patients who were attended and treated with tibial pylon fracture from January 1st, 2015 to December 31st, 2016. A sample composed by 27 patients was chosen.
Results: male sex (78 %) and both-sexes 40-49 age group (37 %) predominated.  There was a predominance of fractures caused by traffic accidents with 59 %, being closed fractures the most represented ones, with 78 %.  67 % of the patients did not present associated injuries, being type II fractures predominant in 55% of the total. 74% of the cases underwent surgery, achieving consolidation in 78% of the cases before 16 weeks. Before 20 weeks, 78% of the cases were indicated to set on their foot, and 13 patients had complications, representing 48% of the total. In spite of this, 63 % of the patients were evaluated as excellent and well as final outcome.
Conclusions: the tibial pylon fracture is an injury of very difficult handling for the today's orthopedic surgeon.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Chua W, Murphy D, Siow W, et al. Epidemiological analysis of outcomes in 323 open tibial diaphyseal fractures: A nine-year experience. Singapore medical Journal [Internet]. 2012 [citado 01/12/20]; 53(6): 385-9. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227342930_Epidemiological_analysis_of_outcomes_in_323_open_tibial_diaphyseal_fractures_A_nine-year_experience.
2. Olivera R, Machain S, Filomeno P. Estrategias de tratamiento quirúrgico en fracturas de pilón tibial de alta energía. Revisión bibliográfica sistematizada. An Facultad Med [Internet]. 20 de septiembre de 2016 [citado 14/01/21]; 3(1): 25-6. Disponible en: http://www.anfamed.edu.uy/index.php/rev/article/view/164.
3. Kawalkar AC, Badole CM. Distal tibia metaphyseal fractures: Which is better, intra-medullary nailing or minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis? Journal of Orthopaedics [Internet]. 2018 [citado 01/12/20]; 24(3): 66-71. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210491716301105.
4. Hernández R, Castro R, Fierro D, et al. Tratamiento en dos tiempos de fracturas de pilón tibial de tipo AO/OTA 43C: ¿influye la síntesis primaria del peroné en el resultado clínico y funcional? Rev del Pie y Tobillo [Internet]. 2014 [citado 01/12/20]; 28(1): 24-8. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302062050_Tratamiento_en_dos_tiempos_de_fracturas_de_pilon_tibial_de_tipo_AOOTA_43C_influye_la_sintesis_primaria_del_perone_en_el_resultado_clinico_y_funcional.
5. Oliveira RV, Cruz LP, Matos MA. Comparative accuracy assessment of the Gustilo and Tscherne classification systems as predictors of infection in open fractures. Rev Brasileira de Ortopedia [Internet]. 2018 [citado 01/12/20]; 53(3): 314-8. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255497118300442?via%3Dihub.
6. Barrionuevo Yugsi DE. Tratamiento fisioterapéutico en fractura del tercio distal de la tibia y peroné a nivel maleolar en el Hospital Pablo Arturo Suárez de la ciudad de Quito en el periodo diciembre 2017–febrero 2018 [tesis en Internet]. Quito: UCE; 2018 [citado 01/12/20]. Disponible en: http://www.dspace.uce.edu.ec/handle/25000/16022.
7. Hernández Hermoso JA, Fernández Sabaté A, Rodríguez Pérez D, et al. Fracturas del pilón tibial. Influencia del tipo de fractura y de la exactitud de la reducción articular en el pronóstico. Rev de Ortopedia y Traumatología [Internet]. 2001 [citado 01/12/20]; 45(5): 389-97. Disponible en: http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/handle/2445/111003.
8. García-Balderas A, Beltrán-Cota E, Ruiz-Barrios J, et al. Resultados del tratamiento de las fracturas del pilón tibial por alta energía. Acta Ortopédica Mexicana [Internet]. 2013 [citado 01/12/20]; 27(6): 363-6. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/ortope/or-2013/or136c.pdf.
9. Ferrer Lozano Y, Morejón Trofimova Y, Oquendo Vázquez P. Uso de fijador externo RALCA® en fracturas abiertas. Experiencia en 14 años. Medisur [Internet]. 2017 Oct [citado 14/01/21]; 15(5): 647-55. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1727-897X2017000500010&lng=es.
10. Liu XK, Xu WN, Xue QY, et al. Intramedullary Nailing Versus Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for Distal Tibial Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Orthop Surg. 2019 Dec; 11(6): 954-65. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 31823496; PMCID: PMC6904655.
11. Dehghan N, McKee MDJJ. What’s New in Orthopaedic Trauma? The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery [Internet]. July 3, 2019 [citado 01/12/20]; 101(13): 1138-43. Disponible en: https://journals.lww.com/jbjsjournal/Fulltext/2019/07030/What_s_New_in_Orthopaedic_Trauma.2.aspx.
12. Dhakar A, Annappa R, Gupta M, et al. Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis with Locking Plates for Distal Tibia Fractures. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Mar; 10(3):RC01-4. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 27134954; PMCID: PMC4843339.
13. Galante VN, Vicenti G, Corina G, et al. Hybrid external fixation in the treatment of tibial pilon fractures: A retrospective analysis of 162 fractures. Injury [Internet]. 2016 Oct [citado 01/12/20]; 47: 131-7. Disponible en: https://www.clinicalkey.es/#!/content/playContent/1-s2.0-S0020138316303424?returnurl=null&referrer=null.
14. Kim GB, Shon OJ, Park CH. Treatment of AO/OTA Type C Pilon Fractures Through the Anterolateral Approach Combined with the Medial MIPO Technique. Foot Ankle Int. 2018 Apr; 39(4): 426-32. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 29359596.
15. Shi D, Liu K, Zhang H, et al. Investigating the biomechanical function of the plate-type external fixator in the treatment of tibial fractures: a biomechanical study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. [Internet]. 2020 Feb. [citado 01/12/20]; 21(1): 128. Disponible en: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-020-3144-5.
16. Mar'éi MM, El-Kady RH, El-Aidy SM, et al. Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis in Treatment of Distal Tibial Fractures. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine [Internet]. 2020 Ene. [citado 01/12/20]; 78(2): 220-6. Disponible en: https://ejhm.journals.ekb.eg/article_69682.html.
17. Hirsch SM, Flores AF, Ardiles CO, et al. Comprendiendo las fracturas triplanares de la tibia distal. Rev Chil Radiol [Internet]. 2016 Sep. [citado 01/12/20]; 22(3): 114-20. Disponible en: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-93082016000300006&lng=es.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rchira.2016.09.002.
18. Yunga Bravo MP, Yunga Bravo GF. Microorganismos más frecuentes en fracturas expuestas. RECIAMUC [Internet]. 1 may 2020 [citado 14/01/21]; 4(2): 68-5.Disponible en: https://reciamuc.com/index.php/RECIAMUC/article/view/480.

Published

2021-03-10

How to Cite

1.
Amigo Castañeda P, Rodríguez Díaz M, Reguera Rodríguez R, Fernández Valle O, Amigo Rodríguez PA. Outcomes assessment in the treatment of patients with tibial pylon fractures. Rev Méd Electrón [Internet]. 2021 Mar. 10 [cited 2025 Jan. 23];43(2):389-405. Available from: https://revmedicaelectronica.sld.cu/index.php/rme/article/view/4186

Issue

Section

Research article

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>