Results of the patients operated on therapeutic keratoplasty in the province of Matanzas

Authors

Keywords:

severe corneal ulcers, therapeutic keratoplasty, postsurgical complications

Abstract

Introduction: therapeutic keratoplasty is defined as a procedure whose purpose is to help eradicate or reduce the infection when maximum medical therapy is not efficacious to achieve this end.

Objective: to evaluate the evolution and results of the patients operated on therapeutic keratoplasty.

Materials and methods: a cross-sectional, descriptive study was carried out in a universe of 15 patients with a diagnosis of severe corneal ulcer. The patients underwent therapeutic keratoplasty surgeries in the Cornea Service of the Clinical Surgical University Hospital Comandante Faustino Perez Hernandez, in the province of Matanzas, between April 2017 and May 2020, and gave their informed consent to participate in the research.

Results: male gender predominated, with 53.3% and a mean age of 58.8 years. As predisposing factors, trauma antecedent predominated in 33.3%, followed by the use of contact lenses and diabetes mellitus as associated systemic disease. Ulcers of mycotic etiology predominated in 26.6% of the cases; corneal perforation and descemetoceles occurred in 40% and 26.6% of the cases respectively. During the first month, the most frequent postsurgery complications were recidival sepsis and graft necrosis. On the other hand, corneal opacity and vascularization were the most frequent sequels.

Conclusions: the delay in initiating the adequated protocol treatment causes severe symptoms of the disease that lead to “in hot” keratoplasty in perforated or necrosed corneas, causing postsurgery complications and non-encouraging sequels for patients.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ibet Olga Alemán-Suárez, Hospital Universitario Clínico Quirúrgico Comandante Faustino Pérez Hernández. Matanzas

Especialista de II grado en Oftalmología (especialización en córnea y catarata)

References

1. Al Rajhi A, Ambrus A, Lastra R, et al. Bacterial Keratitis. San Francisco, California: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2018.

2. Bowling B. Kanski. Oftalmología clínica. 8ª ed. Madrid: Elsevier; 2016. p. 175-81.

3. Ku Lozano J, Samudio M, Penniecook-Sawyers JA, et al. Características clínico-epidemiológicas y evolución del tratamiento con ulceras corneales. Mem inst Investig Cienc Salud [Internet]. 2019 [citado 10/10/2019];17(1):16-24. Disponible en: http://scielo.iics.una.py/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1812-95282019000100016

4. Jayasudha R, Chakravarthy SK, Prashanthi GS, et al. Alterations in gut bacterial and fungal microbiomes are associated with bacterial Keratitis, an inflammatory disease of the human eye. J Biosci. 2018 Dec;43(5):835-56. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 30541945.

5. López Hernández SM, Rodríguez de Paz U, Hernández Fernández Y. Tema 6. Queratitis infecciosa. En: Ríos Torres M, Fernández Argones L, Hernández Silva JR, et al. Oftalmología. Diagnóstico y tratamiento. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2018. p. 81-5.

6. López Hernández SM, Castañeda Rojas J, Castillo Pérez A, et al. Factores predisponentes a queratoplastia terapéutica en los pacientes con úlcera grave de la córnea. Rev Cubana Oftalmol [Internet]. 2019 [citado 10/10/2019];32(2). Disponible en: https://revoftalmologia.sld.cu/index.php/oftalmologia/article/view/730/html-390

7. Barraquer RI, Álvarez de Toledo J. Queratoplastias: nuevas técnicas para el siglo XXI. Barcelona: Sociedad Española de Oftalmología; 2016.

8. Centro Mexicano de Cornea y Cirugía Refractiva. Córnea Quirúrgica. México: Permanyer; 2019.

9. Tan DT, Janardhanan P, Zhou H, et al. Penetrating keratoplasty in Asian eyes: the Singapore Corneal Transplant Study. Ophthalmology. 2008 Jun;115(6):975-82. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 18061267.

10. Mascarenhas J, Lalitha P, Prajna NV, et al. Acanthamoeba, fungal, and bacterial keratitis: a comparison of risk factors and clinical features. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jan;157(1):56-62. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 24200232.

11. Pérez Parra Z, Arpasi Huanca NL, Padilla González CM, et al. Comportamiento clínico epidemiológico de los pacientes con diagnóstico de úlcera grave de la córnea. Rev Cubana Oftalmol [Internet]. 2016 [citado 10/10/2019];29(2):260-70. Disponible en: https://revoftalmologia.sld.cu/index.php/oftalmologia/article/view/446

12. Maghsoudlou P, Sood G, Akhondi H. Cornea Transplantation [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 [citado 16/02/2021]. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK539690/

13. Jabbehdari S, Baradaran Rafii A, Yazdanpanah G, et al. Update on the Management of High-Risk Penetrating Keratoplasty. Curr Ophthalmol Rep. 2017;5(1):38-48. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 28959505.

14. Barut Selver O, Karaca I, Palamar M, et al. Graft Failure and Repeat Penetrating Keratoplasty. Exp Clin Transplant. 2021 Jan;19(1):72-6. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 29697353.

15. Pereira Cruz GK, Ferreira Júnior MA, Azevedo IC, et al. Clinical and surgical factors and intraoperative complications in patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2019 Apr 29;27:e3141. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 31038635.

Published

2023-04-19

How to Cite

1.
Alemán-Suárez IO, de-Armas-Hernández N, Armengol-Oramas Y, Suárez-Herrera V. Results of the patients operated on therapeutic keratoplasty in the province of Matanzas. Rev Méd Electrón [Internet]. 2023 Apr. 19 [cited 2025 Feb. 5];45(2):e4711. Available from: https://revmedicaelectronica.sld.cu/index.php/rme/article/view/4711

Issue

Section

Research article