Incidence of sexual erectile dysfunction associated with open radical and laparoscopic prostatectomy
Keywords:
laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, open radical prostatectomy, erectile dysfunctionAbstract
Introduction: the difficulty or impossibility of achieving a successful sexual activity despite being present the adequate conditions for its successful development is known as sexual dysfunction. If the difficulty consists in reaching and maintaining the erection necessary for a penetration, erectile dysfunction occurs.
Objective: to describe the erectile dysfunction in patients with prostate cancer undergoing open vs. laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, in the Comandante Faustino Perez Hernandez University Hospital, of Matanzas, between January 2010 and January 2020.
Materials and methods: a longitudinal retrospective study was carried out in the 40 patients who attended Prostate Cancer Provincial Consultation and underwent radical surgery between January 2010 and January 2020.
Results: 52.5% of the patients were aged between 65 and 74 on average. A Charlson comorbidity index of 3 to 5 points prevailed in 75% of the sample. In the laparoscopic pathway all the cases presented erectile dysfunction, being severe in 50% of them. 22.5% of the total did not have it, representing 30% of those operated by open surgery.
Conclusions: radical prostatectomy continues to be considered one of the treatments of choice for organ-confined prostate cancer. The main cause of the presence of erectile dysfunction is attributed to the surgical procedure; advanced age can contribute to a worse prognosis and adjuvant diseases. The results in the sexual sphere of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy are heterogeneous compared with the international bibliography.
Downloads
References
2. Chen L, Shi G, Huang D, et al. Male sexual dysfunction: A review of literature on its pathological mechanisms, potential risk factors, and herbal drug intervention. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy [Internet]. 2019 [citado 16/07/2022];112:108585. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0753332218353289
3. De Lira GHS, Fornari A, Cardoso LF, et al. Effects of perioperative pelvic floor muscle training on early recovery of urinary continence and erectile function in men undergoing radical prostatectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Int Braz J Urol [Internet]. 2019 [citado 16/07/2022];45(6):1196-203. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0238
4. Ladegaard PBJ, Mortensen J, Skov-Jeppesen SM, et al. Erectile Dysfunction. A Prospective Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Effect of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (LI-ESWT) in Men with Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy. Sex Med. 2021 Jun;9(3):100338. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 33789173.
5. Schoentgen N, Califano G, Manfredi C, et al. Is it Worth Starting Sexual Rehabilitation Before Radical Prostatectomy? Results from a Systematic Review of the Literature. Front Surg. 2021;8:648345. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.648345
6. Jarzemski P, et al. Cognitive function, depression, and anxiety in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with and without adjuvant treatment. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019 Apr;15:819-29. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 31040681.
7. Zambon JP, Patel M, Hemal A, et al. Nonhuman primate model of persistent erectile and urinary dysfunction following radical prostatectomy: Feasibility of minimally invasive therapy. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Sep;37(7):2141-50. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 30168617.
8. Zhang P, Qian B, Shi J, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus brachytherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer on oncological and functional outcomes: a meta-analysis. Transl Androl Urol [Internet]. 2020 Apr;9(2):332-43. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 32420139.
9. Eggener SE, Scardino PT, Walsh PC, et al. Predicting 15-years prostate cancer specific mortality after radical prostatectomy. J Urol [Internet]. 2011 [citado 16/07/2022];185:869-75. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.10.057
10. European Association of Urology. Guidelines on Prostate Cancer - Uroweb [Internet]. Arnhem (The Netherlands): European Association of Urology; 2022 [citado 16/07/2022]. Disponible en: https://uroweb.org/guidelines/prostate-cancer
11. Escudero JU, Ramos de Campos M, Ordoño Domínguez F, et al. Radical prostatectomy complications: evolution and conservative management of urinary incontinence. Actas Urol Esp [Internet]. 2006 Dic [citado 16/07/2022];30(10):991-7. Disponible en: https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0210-48062006001000005&lng=es
12. Huang W, Zhang Y, Shen BH, et al. Outcomes of health-related quality of life after open, laparoscopic, or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in China. Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Jan;18(11):899-907. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S189893.
13. Wu SY, Chang CL, Chen CI, et al. Comparison of Acute and Chronic Surgical Complications Following Robot-Assisted, Laparoscopic, and Traditional Open Radical Prostatectomy Among Men in Taiwan. JAMA Network Open [Internet]. 2021 Aug [citado 20/07/2022];4(8):e2120156. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.20156
14. Pernar CH, Ebot EM, Wilson KM, et al. The Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2018 dec;38(12):a030361. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a030361.
15. Vidal AC, Oyekunle T, Howard LE, et al. Obesity, race, and long-term prostate cancer outcomes. Cancer [Internet]. 2020 [citado 20/07/2022];126(16):3733-41. Disponible en: https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.32906
16. Wilkins LJ, Tosoian JJ, Reichard CA, et al. Oncologic outcomes among Black and White men with grade group 4 or 5 (Gleason score 8-10) prostate cancer treated primarily by radical prostatectomy. Cancer. 2021;127(9):1425-31. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 33721334.
17. Pak S, You D, Jeong IG, et al. Cause of Mortality after Radical Prostatectomy and the Impact of Comorbidity in Men with Prostate Cancer: A Multi-institutional Study in Korea. Cancer Research and Treatment. 2020;52(4):1242-50. DOI: 10.4143/crt.2020.286.
18. Howard JM. Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Radical Prostatectomy—Is the Jury Still Out? JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(8):e2120693. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.20693.
19. Ilic D, Evans SM, Allan CA, et al. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2017 Sep [citado 20/07/2022];9:CD009625. Disponible en: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2/full
20. Montorsi F, Guazzoni G, Strambi LF, et al. Recovery of spontaneous erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubical prostatectomy with and without early intracavernous injections of alprostadil: results of a prospective, randomized trial. J Urol. 1997;158(4):1408-10. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 9302132.
21. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, et al. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology [Internet]. 1997 [citado 20/07/2022];49(6):822-30. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00238-0
22. Houédé N, Rébillard X, Bouvet S, et al. Impact on quality of life 3 years after diagnosis of prostate cancer patients below 75 at diagnosis: an observational case-control study. BMC Cancer. 2020 Aug;20(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07244-y.
23. Fernández-García A, Carreño-Rodríguez J, González-Martín R, et al. Prostatectomía radical laparoscópica. Experiencia inicial. Rev Cubana Urol [Internet]. 2014 [citado 20/07/2022];2(2). Disponible en: https://revurologia.sld.cu/index.php/rcu/article/view/109
24. Cai T, Cocci A, Di Maida F, et al. Visceral adiposity is associated with worse urinary and sexual function recovery after radical prostatectomy: Results from a longitudinal cohort study. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2021 Sep;93(3):285-90. DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2021.3.285.
25. Baunacke M, Schmidt ML, Groeben C, et al. Treatment of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction: there is insufficient utilisation of care in German cancer survivors. World J Urol. 2021;39(8):2929-36. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 33263177.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All content published in this journal is Open Access, distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC 4.0 License.
It allows:
- Copy and redistribute published material in any medium or format.
- Adapt the content.
This will be done under the following terms:
- Attribute the authors' credits and indicate whether changes were made, in which case it must be in a reasonable way.
- Non-commercial use.
- Recognize the journal where it is published.
The copyrights of each article are maintained, without restrictions.