Satisfaction with the supervision (advise) of thesis by undergraduate students

Authors

Keywords:

estudiantes de odontología; universidad; tesis académicas; satisfacción; tesis

Abstract

Introduction: The preparation of a thesis involves stages of student autonomy and supervisor support. A relationship is established between the two that is not always appropriate. Hence the importance of studying the role of the supervisor, the relationships established between the two, the elements that influence the satisfaction of the advisor, as well as the quality of supervision.

Objective: To analyze the satisfaction presented by the thesis students of a faculty of Dentistry with respect to their thesis supervisors.

Methods: Cross-sectional, descriptive study that included 108 undergraduate students from the Faculty of Dentistry of the Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (Lima, Peru). The perception they have about the supervision process of their undergraduate thesis (motivation, experience, orientation, autonomy, support, satisfaction and quality) was assessed with the use of a scale and open questions. The analysis was performed through frequencies and response coding.

Results: 14.8% agreed with the relationship established with the advisor (higher values for fifth-year students), and 50.9% disagreed. Advisors with a specialist degree presented the higher satisfaction agreement (15.7%). Those teachers who did not master the subject presented greater disagreement (37%) and those who were imposed (35.2%) as well. Fifth-year students show a higher frequency of satisfaction unlike boarding school students (21.3% vs. 7.4%). Women presented higher frequencies (19.4%), agreeing with the relationship established with their advisor.

Conclusions: Most of the thesis students are not satisfied with the supervision of their advisors. The biggest disagreements are among advisers who do not master the subject, are not researchers and are imposed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Castro-Rodríguez Y, Lara Verástegui R, Pares Ballasco G, et al. Validez de contenido y estructura de una escala sobre imitantes para la elaboración de una tesis universitaria. Educ Méd Super [Internet]. 2020 [citado 12/03/2024];34(2). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21412020000200009

2. Ädel A, Skogs J, Lindgren C, et al. The supervisor and student in Bachelor thesis supervision: a broad repertoire of sometimes conflicting roles. Eur J High Educ. 2023;14(2):207-27. DOI: 10.1080/21568235.2022.2162560.

3. Todd MJ, Smith K, Bannister P. Supervising a social science undergraduate dissertation: Staff experiences and perceptions. Teach High Educ. 2006;11(2):161-73. DOI: 10.1080/13562510500527693.

4. Diez C, Arkenau C, Meyer-Wentrup F. Why German medical students abandon dissertations. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2000;13(1):97-100. DOI: 10.1080/135762800110637.

5. Castro-Rodríguez Y, Lara-Verástegui R. Experiencias y percepciones de los graduados de Odontología sobre la culminación de la tesis en una universidad del Perú. Odontol Sanmarquina [Internet]. 2021 [citado 12/03/2024];24(3):235-41. Disponible en: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/biblio-1255452

6. Aldana JJ, Isea J, Colina FJ. Estrés académico y trabajo de grado en licenciatura en educación. Telos. 2020;22(1):91-105. DOI: 10.36390/telos221.07.

7. Morales OA, Rincón AG, Romero JT. Cómo enseñar a investigar en la universidad. Educere [Internet]. 2005 [citado 12/03/2024];9(29):217-24. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=35602910

8. Mamani Benito OJ. El asesor de tesis como Coach: una alternativa para impulsar la producción científica estudiantil. Educac Méd Super [Internet]. 2019 [citado 12/03/2024];33(1):1-13. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumen.cgi?IDARTICULO=90810/1000

9. Baydarova I, Collins HE, Saadi IA. Alignment of doctoral student and supervisor expectations in Malaysia. Int J Doct Stud. 2021;16(1):1-29. DOI: 10.28945/4682.

10. Cekiso M, Tshotsho B, Masha R, et al. Supervision Experiences of Postgraduate Research Students at One South African Higher Education Institution. S Afr J High Educ. 2019;33(3):8-25. DOI: 10.20853/33-3-2913.

11. Del Río ML, Díaz-Vázquez R, Maside-Sanfiz JM. Satisfaction with the supervision of undergraduate dissertations. Act Learn High Educ [Internet]. 2018 [citado 12/03/2024];19(2):159-72. Disponible en: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1184892

12. Castro-Rodríguez Y. Relación entre enfoque de supervisión y satisfacción de la tesis universitaria en Odontología. ODOVTOS-Int J Dental Sc [Internet]. 2022 [citado 12/03/2024];24(2):34-46. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumen.cgi?IDARTICULO=105339

13. Vera J, Briones E. Students’ perspectives on the processes of supervision and assessment of undergraduate dissertations. Cult educ. 2015;27(4):726-65. DOI: 10.1080/11356405.2015.1089391.

14. Roberts LD, Seaman K. Students’ Experiences of Undergraduate Dissertation Supervision. Front Educ. 2018;3. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2018.00109.

15. Moran C, Richard A, Wilson K, et al. I know it’s bad, but I have been pressured into it: Questionable research practices among psychology students in Canada. Can Psychol [Internet]. 2023 [citado 12/03/2024];64(1):12-24. Disponible en: https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2022-44637-001

16. Razali R, Hawe E, Dixon H. How are undergraduate students supervised? Perceptions of students and supervisors in a Malaysian university. Issues Educ Res [Internet]. 2020 [citado 12/03/2024];30(4):1484-501. Disponible en: https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/handle/2292/54261

17. Castro-Rodríguez Y. Retos en la supervisión de tesis de los programas de las ciencias de la salud. Rev Cubana Inv Bioméd [Internet]. 2024 [citado 12/03/2024];43:e2693. Disponible en: https://revibiomedica.sld.cu/index.php/ibi/article/view/2693

18. Everitt J, Blackburn C. Using stimulus material to explore how supervisors and candidates clarify expectations during the research supervision process in England. Int J Dr Stud. 2023;18:25-53. DOI: 10.28945/5081.

19. Heinze A, Heinze B. Blended e-learning skeleton of conversation: Improving formative assessment in undergraduate dissertation supervision. Br J Educ Technol. 2019;40(2):294-305. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00923.x.

20. Rowley J, Slack F. What is the future for undergraduate dissertations? Education and Training [Internet]. 2004 [citado 12/03/2024];46(4):176-81. Disponible en: https://shura.shu.ac.uk/4/1/fulltext.pdf

Published

2025-02-12 — Updated on 2025-03-14

Versions

How to Cite

1.
Castro-Rodríguez Y. Satisfaction with the supervision (advise) of thesis by undergraduate students. Rev Méd Electrón [Internet]. 2025 Mar. 14 [cited 2025 Apr. 16];47:e5857. Available from: https://revmedicaelectronica.sld.cu/index.php/rme/article/view/5857

Issue

Section

Research article