Reflection on cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Oxford Elbow Score in elbow injuries

Authors

Keywords:

Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Validation Studies; Reproducibility of Results; Questionnaires; Elbow Injuries

Abstract

The exchange of standardized information at the national and international levels using validated and low-cost tools is a topic of interest in the clinical and social fields. Therefore, the aspects related to cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the different adaptations of the Oxford Elbow Score presented in the literature are analyzed. The above, in order to highlight the feasibility and necessity of developing a Spanish version that allows feedback on the impact of the approaches and interventions developed in patients with elbow disorders. Likewise, the use of different tests that corroborate the rigor of existing versions of the Oxford Elbow Score is highlighted and discussed, as well as certain shortcomings and limitations in components of specific versions. Finally, the paper concludes with aspect related to the construction of the Oxford Elbow Score, its validation, practicality, and the role of the patient in its use.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Jhonattan Alexander Roa-Cruz, Universidad de Cundinamarca

Bachelor's degree in Physical Education, Recreation, and Sports. Specialist in Sports Training. Master's degree in Physiology. Professor and Researcher at the University of Cundinamarca, Soacha, Colombia.

Carlos Alberto Romero-Cuestas, Universidad de Cundinamarca

Bachelor of Physical Education. Specialist in Educational Legislation and Procedures. Doctor of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences. PhD candidate in Human Motricity. Research Professor.

Brian Johan Bustos-Viviescas , Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO

Bachelor's degree in Basic Education with an emphasis on Physical Education, Recreation, and Sports. Specialist in Research Methods and Techniques. Master's degree in Physical Activity and Sports Training. PhD candidate in Public Health. Coordinator of Formative Research.

References

1. Barakat A, Evans J, Gibbons C, et al. Optimizing Oxford Shoulder Scores with computerized adaptive testing reduces redundancy while maintaining precision. Bone Joint Res. 2024;13(8):392-400. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.138.BJR-2023-0412.R1.

2. Wänström J, Jonsson EÖ, Björnsson Hallgren H, et al. The minimal important difference and smallest detectable change of the Oxford elbow score, Quick disabilities of the arm shoulder and hand and single assessment numeric evaluation used for elbow trauma. JSES Int. 2024;8(4):897-902. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.02.011.

3. Engelke J, Vorm Walde M, Schnetzke M, et al. High correlation of the subjective elbow value with Mayo Elbow Performance Score and Oxford Elbow Score in patients with elbow dislocation. JSES Int. 2023;7(5):868-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.04.010.

4. Teoh WW, Scholes C, Clitherow H. Agreement between the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Society Standardized Shoulder Assessment score (ASES) and the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) in patients presenting with shoulder pathology: A cohort analysis of the Clinical Quality Registry for Outcomes in Shoulder and Elbow Pathology (CROSEP) registry. Shoulder Elbow. 2022;14(6):682-91. DOI: 10.1177/17585732211056073.

5. Ebrahimzadeh MH, Kachooei AR, Vahedi E, et al. Validity and cross-cultural adaptation of the persian version of the oxford elbow score. Int J Rheumatol. 2014;2014:381237. DOI: 10.1155/2014/381237.

6. Giannaka M, Andrigiannakis A, Dimitriadis Z, et al. Cross-cultural validation of the Oxford Elbow Score and Mayo Elbow Performance Score in Greek. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2022;57:102499. DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102499.

7. De Haan J, Goei H, Schep NW, et al. The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score. J Orthop Surg Res. 2011;6:39. DOI: 10.1186/1749-799X-6-39.

8. Ngwayi JRM, Tan J, Liang N, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Chinese version of the Oxford elbow score. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15(1):562. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-02100-y.

9. Plaschke HC, Jørgensen A, Thillemann TM, et al. Validation of the Danish version of the Oxford Elbow Score. Dan Med J [Internet]. 2013 [citado 21/04/2025];60(10):A4714. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24083528/

10. Yosmaoglu HB, Doğan D, Sonmezer E. Fiabilidad y validez de la versión turca del Oxford Elbow Score. J Orthop Surg Res. 2016;11(1):95. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-016-0429-3.

11. Khaja AF, Hanna SS, Saleh AA, et al. Una adaptación transcultural de Oxford Elbow Score: la versión árabe. J Musculoesqueleto Res. 2020;23(3):2050015. DOI: 10.1142/s0218957720500153.

12. Padovani S, Capuzzo M, Massari L, et al. Validation of the cross-cultural adapted Italian version of the Oxford Elbow Score. JSES Int. 2021;5(2):328-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.10.025.

13. Marquardt J, Schöttker-Königer T, Schäfer A. Validierung der deutschen Version des Oxford Elbow Score : Eine Querschnittsstudie. Orthopade. 2016;45(8):695-700. DOI: 10.1007/s00132-016-3292-3.

14. Jonsson EÖ, Wänström J, Björnsson Hallgren H, et al. The Oxford Elbow Score demonstrated good measurement properties when used with a shortened 7-day recall period. JSES Int. 2023;7(3):499-505. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.12.023.

Published

2025-12-03

How to Cite

1.
Roa-Cruz JA, Romero-Cuestas CA, Bustos-Viviescas BJ. Reflection on cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Oxford Elbow Score in elbow injuries. Rev Méd Electrón [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 3 [cited 2026 Mar. 3];47:e6695. Available from: https://revmedicaelectronica.sld.cu/index.php/rme/article/view/6695

Issue

Section

Opinion article