Pragmatic learning program to improve text comprehension in adolescents with dyslexia

Authors

Keywords:

pragmatic learning; text comprehension; adolescents; dyslexia

Abstract

Introduction: Providing an innovative and complementary perspective to traditional approaches can be managed by introducing the pragmatic dimension as a tool to improve reading comprehension. However, curricular adaptations must be based on the needs of the student population, hence the need of evaluating the effects on specific populations.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of pragmatic learning on the text comprehension in adolescent students with dyslexia.

Methods: Quasi-experimental research with an equivalent control group was conducted. A representative and sufficient sample (n=96) was studied, classified into two independent groups (experimental and control: n=48 each). The experimental group received an intervention based on pragmatic learning, while the control group continued its traditional teaching-educational process.

Results: The independent groups showed homogeneity in the studied dimensions before starting the intervention (p>0.05); the experimental group improved significantly at the end of the intervention process (p<0.0001). At the end of this process, the control group did not significantly improve its performance (p>0.05), and the experimental group significantly improved in all the dimensions studied (literal, inferential, critical, ACL-5), with a notable improvement in reading comprehension of progressive linguistic complexity.

Conclusions: It is demonstrated that a pragmatic, contextualized, multisensory, and meaningful approach significantly enhances reading comprehension in adolescents with dyslexia. By identifying cognitive and communicative skills and providing students with strategies adapted to their situation, not only school performance is improved but also self-esteem, motivation, and educational inclusion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Cutting J, Fordyce K. Pragmatics: a resource book for students. London: Routledge; 2021. DOI: 10.4324/9781003010043.

2. Mier F. Leer, comprender e interpretar. Bogotá: Ediciones de la U; 2023.

3. Ferrara M, Camia M, Cecere V, et al. Language and pragmatics across neurodevelopmental disorders: An investigation using the Italian version of CCC-2. J Autism Dev Disord. 2020;50(4):1295-309. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-019-04358-6.

4. Hüser L, von Kriegstein K, Müller-Axt C. Pragmatic competence in native German adults with and without Developmental Dyslexia. Int Rev Pragmat. 2023;15(1):32-62. DOI: 10.1163/18773109-01501002.

5. Troia GA, Hennenfent LL, Shen M. Pragmatic skills in school-age children with primary language impairment and language-learning disabilities: A scoping review of research from 1990 to 2022. Top Lang Disord. 2023;43(3):210-50. DOI: 10.1097/TLD.0000000000000317.

6. Rahmalina R, Putri VN, Hilmi L, et al. Body language and words: a multimodal analysis of elite athletes' communication. Retos. 2025;66:26-45. DOI: 10.47197/retos.v66.112706.

7. Rodríguez Torres AF, Naranjo Munive JE, Merino Alberca WV, et al. Adaptaciones curriculares en la enseñanza para alumnos con problemas respiratorios. Rev Cubana Med Gen Integr [Internet]. 2017 [citado 26/06/2025];33(4). Disponible en: https://revmgi.sld.cu/index.php/mgi/article/view/717

8. Fernández Lorenzo A, Armijos Robles L, Cárdenas Coral F, et al. Elementos clave para perfeccionar la enseñanza del inglés en la Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE. Educ Méd Super [Internet]. 2018 [citado 26/06/2025];32(1). Disponible en: http://ems.sld.cu/index.php/ems/article/view/1066

9. Dobrovol'skij D, Piirainen E. Figurative language: Cross-cultural and cross-linguistic perspectives. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG; 2021.

10. Casadiego AM, Santiuste Bermejo V, Bermejo Fernandez V. Spatial thinking skills mediated by communication processes in preschool children. Retos. 2023;48:74-85. DOI: 10.47197/retos.v48.89684.

11. Mather N, Wendling BJ. Essentials of dyslexia assessment and intervention. 2nd ed. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons; 2024.

12. Bazen L, van den Boer M, de Jong PF, et al. Early and late diagnosed dyslexia in secondary school: Performance on literacy skills and cognitive correlates. Dyslexia. 2020;26(4):359-76. DOI: 10.1002/dys.1652.

13. Game Mendoza KM, Vinueza Burgos GdC, Icaza Rivera DP, et al. Efectos de las estrategias colaborativas en el proceso académico de enseñanza-aprendizaje de voleibolistas prejuveniles. Retos. 2024;61:1172-83. DOI: 10.47197/retos.v61.109363.

14. Tricot A, Vandenbroucke G, Sweller J. Using cognitive load theory to improve text comprehension for students with dyslexia. En: Martin AJ, Sperling RA, Newton KJ. Handbook of educational psychology and students with special needs [Internet]. Philadelphia: Routledge; 2020 [citado 26/06/2025]. Disponible en: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2020-15663-015

15. Eide BL, Eide FF. The dyslexic advantage (revised and updated): Unlocking the hidden potential of the dyslexic brain. Nueva York: Penguin; 2023.

16. Thangarajathi S, Menaha P. Effect of Cognitive Strategies on Enhancing Phonemic Awareness of Children with Dyslexia. Shanlax Int J Educ. 2020;9(1):133-7. DOI: 10.34293/education.v9i1.3415.

17. Stamenković D, Ichien N, Holyoak KJ. Individual differences in comprehension of contextualized metaphors. Metaphor Symbol. 2020;35(4):285-301. DOI: 10.1080/10926488.2020.1821203.

18. Qushem UB, Christopoulos A, Oyelere SS, et al. Multimodal technologies in precision education: Providing new opportunities or adding more challenges? Educ Sci. 2021;11(7):338. DOI: 10.3390/educsci11070338.

19. Tixi Sotamba JP, Piedra Martinez E. Impacto de un Programa de Intervención Lectora en Niños de Educación Básica de Escuelas Públicas. Cienc Lat Rev Cient Multidiscip. 2024;8(3):8621-40. DOI: 10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i3.12028.

20. Calero Morales S, Fernández Lorenzo A, Castillo de la Rosa FL. Recreation activities to improve social behavior. Study in children and adolescents aged 9-14. Rev Cubana Med Gen Integr [Internet]. 2016 [citado 26/06/2025];32(3). Disponible en: http://revmgi.sld.cu/index.php/mgi/article/view/269/98

21. Calero Morales S, Pastaz Pillajo DP, Cabezas Flores M, et al. Influence of physical activity on the social and emotional behavior of children aged 2-5 years. Rev Cubana Med Gen Integr [Internet]. 2016 [citado 26/06/2025];32(3). Disponible en: http://revmgi.sld.cu/index.php/mgi/article/view/268/97

22. Tops W, Jansen D, Ceulemans E, et al. Participation problems and effective accommodations in students with dyslexia in higher education. Eur J Spec Needs Educ. 2022;38(3):317-33. DOI: 10.1080/08856257.2022.2089507.

23. Wilson E, Cain K, Davies C, et al. Children's development of conversational and reading inference skills: a call for a collaborative approach. Lang Dev Res. 2024;4(1):42-79. DOI: 10.34842/89as-7d31.

24. Lovey JP. Constructivismo en Psicología y Educación. Cómo y por qué aprendemos en la Universidad. Rev Psicol. 2025;21(41):41-58. DOI: 10.46553/RPSI.21.41.2025.p41-58.

25. Moyón-Coronel EG, Montero-Ramírez IS, Briones-Suárez KB, et al. Pragmática y uso de lenguaje en estudiantes. MQRInvestigar. 2024;8(2):3944-61. DOI: 10.56048/MQR20225.8.2.2024.3944-3961.

26. Alduais A, Alfadda H, Baraja'a D, et al. Psycholinguistics: Analysis of knowledge domains on children's language acquisition, production, comprehension, and dissolution. Children (Basel). 2022;9(10):1471. DOI: 10.3390/children9101471.

27. Sanfilippo J, Ness M, Petscher Y, et al. Reintroducing dyslexia: Early identification and implications for pediatric practice. Pediatrics. 2020;146(1):e20193046. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2019-3046.

28. Asqui Luna JE, León Sinche J, Santillán Obregón RR, et al. Influencia de la teoría de las inteligencias múltiples en la educación física: estudio de casos. Rev Cubana Invest Bioméd [Internet]. 2017 [citado 26/06/2025];36(3). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S0864-03002017000300012&script=sci_arttext&tlng=pt

29. Rodríguez Torres AF, Páez Granja RE, Altamirano Vaca EJ, et al. Nuevas perspectivas educativas orientadas a la promoción de la salud. Educ Méd Super [Internet]. 2017 [citado 26/06/2025];31(4). Disponible en: https://ems.sld.cu/index.php/ems/article/view/1366

30. Maunsell M. Dyslexia in a global context: a cross-linguistic, cross-cultural perspective. Lat Am J Content Lang Integr Learn. 2020;13(1). DOI: 10.5294/laclil.2020.13.1.6.

Published

2025-12-24

How to Cite

1.
Campoverde-Chamba C del R. Pragmatic learning program to improve text comprehension in adolescents with dyslexia. Rev Méd Electrón [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 24 [cited 2026 Apr. 11];47:e6730. Available from: https://revmedicaelectronica.sld.cu/index.php/rme/article/view/6730

Issue

Section

Research article