Factors Associated with Anatomical Failure and Reduced Functional Recovery after Pneumatic Retinopexy without Standard Criteria

Authors

Keywords:

pneumatic retinopexy; non-standard criteria; anatomical failure; functional recovery

Abstract

Introduction: Pneumatic retinopexy is a therapeutic option for selected rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, although its use has extended beyond the standard criteria.

Objective: To identify factors associated with surgical failure and reduced visual recovery after pneumatic retinopexy in patients without standard criteria.

Methods: Observational, analytical, longitudinal and prospective study conducted at the Ophthalmological Center of Villa Clara, between 2023 and 2024.

Results: Primary reapplication was achieved in 84.8%. Of these, 96.4% achieved functional success. Best corrected visual acuity improved significantly, from 1.5±0.6 (logMAR) to 0.33±0.22, with a mean gain of 53.2±22.5 letters at 12 months. Bivariate analysis showed a significant association between anatomical failure and retinal detachment ≥3 quadrants (p=0.015; Cramer's V=0.617), and a marginal association with lens status (p=0.052; Phi=-0.401), with a higher risk of failure in pseudophakic eyes. The poorest visual recovery was associated with evolution time (>10 days), preoperative visual acuity (>1.30 logMAR), and detachment extent (>2 quadrants).

Conclusions: Pneumatic retinopexy is an effective option in patients without standard criteria. Clinical variables such as evolution time, detachment extent, lens status, and preoperative visual acuity are associated with anatomical and functional outcome. Comprehensive evaluation of these factors is essential to optimize patient selection and improving therapeutic effectiveness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Nisanova A, Yavary A, Deaner J, et al. Performance of automated machine learning in predicting outcomes of pneumatic retinopexy. Ophthalmol Sci. 2024;4(5):100470. DOI: 10.1016/j.xops.2024.100470.

2. Karam M, Alsaif A, Kahlar N, et al. Pneumatic retinopexy versus pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2023;54(6):354-61. DOI: 10.3928/23258160-20230508-03.

3. Huang YT, Yang CH, Chen SJ, et al. Guidelines and treatment patterns for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments: expert consensus and survey in Taiwan Retina Society. J Chin Med Assoc. 2024;87(1):25-32. DOI: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001010.

4. Márquez Falcón A, Cabanes Goy L, Granado Pérez R. Retinopexia Neumática, solución de un desprendimiento regmatógeno de retina sin criterios tradicionales. Rev Cubana Oftalmol [Internet]. 2024 [citado 14/08/2025];37. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21762024000100015

5. Roshanshad A, Shirzadi S, Binder S, et al. Pneumatic retinopexy versus pars plana vitrectomy for the management of retinal detachment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmol Ther. 2023;12(2):705-19. DOI: 10.1007/s40123-023-00653-9.

6. Yamada H, Akiyama K, Sotani Y, et al. Outcomes of pneumatic retinopexy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in a Japanese cohort. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):24182. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-09068-x.

7. Carpineto P, Licata AM, Ciancaglini M. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy: a reappraisal. J Clin Med. 2023;12(16):5287. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12165287.

8. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. Medical Research Involving Human Participants [Internet]. Ferney-Voltaire: World Medical Association; 2024 [citado 14/08/2025]. Disponible en: https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/medical-ethics/declaration-of-helsinki/

9. Owais Arshad M, Javed K, Javed A, et al. Pneumatic Retinopexy: An Experience of 12 Years at a Tertiary Care Hospital. Cureus. 2023;15(9):e46180. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46180.

10. Ipekli Z, Pehlivanoglu S, Artunay O. Efficacy of pneumatic retinopexy in young adults with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2023;15:25158414231208279. DOI: 10.1177/25158414231208279.

11. Yannuzzi NA, Li C, Fujino D, et al. Clinical Outcomes of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Treated with Pneumatic Retinopexy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021;139(8):848-53. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.1860.

12. Iannetta D, Valsecchi B, Finzi A, et al. Pneumatic retinopexy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: from a clinical trial to the real-life experience. BMC Ophthalmol. 2024;24(1):287. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-024-03559-7.

13. Jung JJ, Cheng J, Pan JY, et al. Anatomic, Visual, and Financial Outcomes for Traditional and Nontraditional Primary Pneumatic Retinopexy for Retinal Detachment. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;200:187-200. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.01.008.

14. Aykut A, Sevik MO, Kubat B, et al. A Useful Method for the Practice of Pneumatic Retinopexy: Slit-Lamp Laser Photocoagulation through the Gas Bubble. J Pers Med. 2023;13(5):741. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13050741.

15. Muni RH, Felfeli T, Sadda SR, et al. Postoperative Photoreceptor Integrity Following Pneumatic Retinopexy vs Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Retinal Detachment Repair: A Post Hoc Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis from the Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Vitrectomy for the Management of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Outcomes Randomized Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021;139(6):620-7. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.0803.

16. Griffin SH, Chan L, McCarthy K, et al. Pneumatic Retinopexy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Outcomes: IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) Analysis. Ophthalmol Retina. 2025;9(5):437-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2024.10.025.

17. Márquez Falcón A, Cabanes Goy L, Ramos Ravelo Y, et al. Retinopexia neumática para el tratamiento de desprendimientos regmatógenos de retina seleccionados. Rev Cubana Oftalmol [Internet]. 2023 [citado 14/08/2025];36(4). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21762023000400003

18. Quezada Osoria ML, Chirinos Saldaña P, Adrianzén R. Factores relacionados al éxito anatómico y funcional de la cirugía por desprendimiento de retina regmatógeno. Instituto Regional de Oftalmología "Javier Servat Univazo" (2010–2019), Trujillo, Perú. Acta Med Peru. 2023;40(3):205-13. DOI: 10.35663/amp.2023.403.2651.

19. Brinton DA, Jun JJ. Pneumatic Retinopexy. En: Sadda SR, Schachat AP, Wilkinson CP. Ryan's Retina [Internet]. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2022 [citado 14/08/2025]. p. 2076-91. Disponible en: https://shop.elsevier.com/books/ryans-retina/sadda/978-0-323-72213-1

20. Castanos MV, Vail D, Otero-Marquez O, et al. Outcomes and variables that impact pneumatic retinopexies. Int J Ophthalmol. 2024;17(3):564-9. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2024.03.20.

Published

2026-08-19

How to Cite

1.
Márquez-Falcón A, Cabanes-Goy L, Ramos-Ravelo Y, Castillo-Bermúdez G. Factors Associated with Anatomical Failure and Reduced Functional Recovery after Pneumatic Retinopexy without Standard Criteria. Rev Méd Electrón [Internet]. 2026 Aug. 19 [cited 2026 Sep. 25];48:e7036. Available from: https://revmedicaelectronica.sld.cu/index.php/rme/article/view/7036

Issue

Section

Research article